Women physicians are leaving clinical practice at a significantly younger age than their male counterparts, creating a widening gap in healthcare availability and expertise. A recent study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine found that female doctors stop billing Medicare around age 49, compared to age 64 for men. This 15-year difference in median attrition ages persists across all medical specialties and rural and urban practice settings, according to Lisa Rotenstein, M.D., MBA, M.Sc., a primary care physician at the University of California, San Francisco, and director of the Center for Physician Experience and Practice Excellence.
Rotenstein defined leaving the profession as having no Medicare billing activity for three consecutive years. The data reveals a bimodal pattern of attrition, with the first decade and a half of practice being the most critical window for female physicians. Rotenstein sat down with Medical Economics Senior Editor Richard Payerchin to discuss the specific drivers behind this trend, including the unique burdens placed on women in the workforce.
Female doctors spend more time at the bedside and generate more administrative work than men. They often write longer notes and respond to a higher volume of patient messages. Despite these extra efforts, research indicates that the quality of care improves when women physicians have more time with patients. However, the financial incentives of the current healthcare system often do not align with these time-intensive practices. Female primary care physicians generate roughly 80 cents in revenue for every dollar earned by male primary care physicians, even while providing more direct care.
Related: Sorry, you have been blocked
When the math is finally run on turnover, the financial impact becomes clear. Physician turnover can cost a practice between $500,000 and $1 million depending on the specialty, yet leaders often prioritize other expenses over retention strategies. Rotenstein argues that the immediate cost of keeping a physician at the bedside is a conversation that gets sidelined in favor of other budget items. She suggests that large health systems could mitigate this by giving clinicians more agency over their schedules and documentation, rather than simply handing them ownership of a practice they may not control.
While the study highlights the disparity, it also points toward potential solutions. A Physicians Foundation-funded study found that AI scribes could reduce burnout in two health systems by cutting down on paperwork. Rotenstein believes the next frontier is addressing prior authorization requirements and other administrative burdens that disproportionately affect female staff. There is also the question of whether the profession can remain sustainable for the majority of medical students, who are now more likely to be women than men. The current trajectory suggests that without structural changes to how care time is paid for and documented, the healthcare system risks losing decades of experience from a highly trained workforce. This shift in workforce demographics presents a challenge for the industry’s future stability.
Addressing these administrative hurdles is essential for maintaining a robust medical workforce. Leaders in healthcare must consider the impact of prior authorizations on [a doctor’s ability to practice effectively](https://perfecthealthsite.my.id/medicare-maternity-billing-codes.html). Rotenstein emphasizes that the system must adapt to the changing reality of who is providing the care. Without these changes, the gap in experience will continue to widen.
